The battle to STOP the pipeline, now in its 18th
month, came to a head in mid-December with the Transco and ANR/Independence applications
prominent on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commissions December 15, 1999 meeting
agenda. What issued from that meeting was a surprise to all parties. In an unprecedented
Interim Order, the Commission voted 3-2 against the issuance of Certificate of Public
Convenience and Necessity at this time.
The pipeline companies had assured anyone who inquired that the go ahead
from the Commission was in the bag. But in refusing to allow construction to begin, FERC
found there was not sufficient proof that the 622 mile, $1.3 billion project was needed.
Even if market need is eventually demonstrated to the Commissions satisfaction, the
companies were hammered with over 100 environmental conditions and restrictions. While
this decision did indeed bring good tidings at Christmas, it did not signal the end of the
fight for either side.
The most significant aspect of the Commission decision focuses on proof of
market need and the failure of ANR/Independence to meet its burden of proof. Simply
stated, a dummy corporation was created by the pipeline companies to purchase capacity as
proof of market need. Three of the five commissioners rejected this as unreliable evidence
and set strict conditions as to what will constitute a valid contract. Disappointingly, if
this single condition, with no time limit to its completion, is met the Commission is
prepared to approve the projects. However, this issue highlighted a deep division among
the commissioners with the minority describing the vote as a "crushing blow to
pipeline expansion" (oh darn it!) and a "pointless disruption of standard FERC
policy" (is standard policy to issue Certificates without paying any attention to the
issues?).
On balance, the FERC Interim Order was a battle won, but not the end of
the war. One of the most critical restrictions imposed by the FERC is the requirement that
no construction can begin until all local, state and other federal permits have been
obtained. According to the FERC, "this is the first time the Commission has denied
permission for construction to proceed on a piecemeal basis as permits are obtained."
From the opposition point of view this is a crucial factor, as it will eliminate the
typical domino effect where the issuance of one permit is used as evidence in support of
the next permit the company is seeking.
One particularly unpleasant aspect of the Interim Order was the finding by
the Commission that Transco had conclusively demonstrated a market need for its MarketLink
Expansion, the segment of the project that runs through New Jersey and the Great Swamp
National Wildlife Refuge. This leaves the door open for Transco to separate itself from
the problems of ANR/Independence and go forward with its wholesale disruption of 34 parks,
174 acres of wetlands, and 555 individual properties. The safety risks associated with
this project, which runs through residential neighborhoods, next to elementary schools and
college dormitories, cannot be quantified.
Not surprisingly, Transco has indicated its intent to proceed with
MarketLink with or without ANR/Independence. To date, Governor Whitman, Senators
Lautenberg and Torricelli, many New Jersey Congressmen, most prominently Rodney
Frelinghuysen and Bill Pascrell, and state and local officials have been active and
forceful opponents to this project. Without their support combined with the thousands of
individuals who wrote and signed petitions, the go ahead probably would have been "in
the bag". Please continue to let your elected officials know that you are still
concerned and they still must remain active and involved.