Last winter I wrote in this space:
"[J]ust imagine what the Great Swamp watershed would look like if it weren't for a
few people who didn't give up! We might have an airport, or have paved over the smallest
tributaries to the headwaters of the mighty Passaic River. This could be an ugly,
unhealthy place to live... and who would want to? By keeping our eyes open and being
unafraid to step up to the plate and voice our concerns, what a difference we make."
When you become exhausted by long nights of municipal meetings on
watershed issues, sometimes depression does overcome determination but, thankfully,
only temporarily.
Voicing our concerns at these meetings is only one of the ways we can
protect this special place the Great Swamp watershed. Other examples run the gamut
of things we do here at GSWA and include:
education programs for kids and adults;
stream monitoring to assess the impact of our land-use decisions on
water purity;
projects to analyze the impact of future growth, and to stimulate the
use of new stormwater management techniques;
participation in stakeholder meetings on environmental rules and
regulations at the state level;
fulfillment of opportunities to promote the marvelous environmental,
historic and recreational resources we have here; and
restoration projects on watershed property.
But theres one additional action we can take that is a permanent
solution to watershed protection: Municipalities, counties, the state of New Jersey,
the federal government and non-profit organizations can buy and preserve property in
perpetuity, or hold conservation/ development easements on watershed lands.
In November 1998, New Jersey voters authorized a ten-year expenditure of
more than $1 billion to buy vacant land, adding it permanently to the states
open-space rolls. This is a goal that GSWA wholeheartedly supports. Recently, though,
questions have been raised as to whether the state is wisely setting its priorities for
open-space acquisition and whether it is ensuring that public funds are spent without
inappropriate influence. Having closely observed the Green Acres process to purchase land
with state funds, I can affirm that there are many safeguards built into the process
safeguards such as working with existing open-space plans; gathering appraisals by
licensed appraisers; and developing photographic and written justification.
In addition, GSWA (with the participation of nine watershed municipalities
and many volunteers) has already completed the planning to guide open-space acquisition
and easements in the Great Swamp watershed. This guide, which has won one state and three
national awards, is helping the state identify where to spend its funds in our area. If
you would like to receive a copy, please call the office and ask for Saving Space: The
Great Swamp Watershed Greenway and Open Space Plan. Cost is $25 per copy.
If we believe, in short, that preserved open space is an essential
contributor to a regions long-term health, then our commitment to fund that belief
must surely be as strong as, for instance, our commitment to build roads or sewage
treatment plants.
There are indeed a number of important programs in place working to save
open space. They include municipal open-space trusts (in the Great Swamp watershed only
Morristown and Madison do not have such a fund), county and state open-space programs, and
active federal acquisition programs for the Wildlife Refuge (see column by Bill Koch in
this issue) and for the Morristown National Historical Park. Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen's
support for these efforts in Congress has been critical to keeping them funded.
However, the bottom line is that we simply cannot afford to save all the
land necessary to buffer the open spaces we own today, protect our environment and
preserve the character of this region unless sympathetic individual landowners are
prepared to make bargain sales, donate conservation easements or make outright gifts of
property for conservation.
GSWA will do its part to help achieve this long-term goal. Please help us
help ourselves!